Wednesday, October 31, 2007

NoozeHawk Interview

[ Excerpt of: "Election Q&A with Das Williams," By Rob Kuznia, NOOZEHAWK, 29 October 2007 ]


NOOZHAWK: What specific actions are the City Council and the police department taking to fight gang violence? What are the benchmarks for success? What has been your involvement on this issue?


DAS WILLIAMS: The Police Department alone spends about $1.6 million a year on youth-related enforcement and prevention programs, about two-thirds on the former, including officers who go to school campuses and a gang unit, and one-third on the latter, including a Police Activites League and D.A.R.E. In addition, our Parks & Recreation Department has scores of activities for kids and teens.

Specifically, I have pushed for a number of expansions in youth prevention and intervention programs in this year's budget. A $25,000 increase to double the current 20 kids involved in our youth apprenticeship program in Parks & Rec. We have had summer drop-off centers (free child care for 8 hours a day) for grade-school children at Ortega Park and three schools. We've eliminated the fees for Sports league programs with the city (which is a lot of money because of the increase of participation we will have), increased staffing of the neighborhood center on the Lower Westside, starting a handball program, and we've increased by $35,000 the money allocated for junior high afterschool sports. It adds up to $174,000 in Recreation and seven new or expanded programs in all.

On intervention, "nothing stops a bullet like a job," as Father Boyle (founder of Homeboy Industries in L.A. that employs former gang members) often says. The city has recently secured a grant that will allow us to fund stipends for youth jobs throughout our community. We are looking for mentorship in sectors that will be well-paying for young people to get into a real career, so if you run a business or nonprofit and want to participate, contact our Parks & Recreation Department.

Additionally, I and my collegues came up with a plan to pay for additional police bike patrols of the Eastside and Westside. Our officers have been making use of association warrants and, where appropriate, searching houses to look for information or caches of weapons. These have been very successful. The ultimate metric of success, however, is fewer gang members in the city, but that takes time. We shall see in the coming years whether our current number of 600 grows or diminishes. There is more to be done, including programs that help parents deal with "at-risk" youth, but both the people who work with our youth and our police officers are supporting Helene, Brian and me, Das Williams, for City Council. They trust us to lead on this issue.


NOOZHAWK: Would you consider an injunction banning certain individuals from wearing apparel associated with gangs?


DW: There are some real constitutional "free association" issues with gang injunctions and that should be a last-resort strategy. If we ever were that desperate, I would say you want to do the type that forbids gang members to "hang out" together, not something as indiscriminate as clothing. I question whether we should be citing people for wearing baggy pants and white T-shirts. I’d likely get cited on one of my days off.


NOOZHAWK: With the General Plan update in motion, what is your vision of what Santa Barbara will look like in 30 years?


DW: My vision is to avoid two possible fates being pushed by the momentum of the market, private-property rights and political power. The first would be to overbuild and sprawl out, becoming like Orange County. The second, and nearly as damaging, would be to not adapt and attempt to preserve a physical status quo, while losing our middle- and working class and becoming a Beverly Hills-By-the-Sea. I endeavor to preserve the distinctive feel of a Santa Barbara that is not too large, is surrounded by open space, yet still has a vibrant and diverse community. To come true, we must replace some of our commercial space with middle-class housing, to reduce commuting and traffic.


NOOZHAWK: Should Santa Barbara’s Sphere of Influence boundaries be expanded? Specifically, what should the boundaries be?


DW: Yes, it should include areas of the Goleta Valley that want better municipal services or even additional protections on land use. However, this should be up to the people themselves and should not include the mobile homes, whose affordability could be threatened by eventual annexation.


NOOZHAWK: Should Highway 101 be widened from Milpas Street to the Rincon?


DW: Yes, and it should be a carpool lane to encourage ride-sharing and be accompanied by more commuter bus service.


NOOZHAWK: Are you willing to spend local tax dollars to bring commuter rail to Santa Barbara?


DW: Absolutely. Our traffic problem is so bad we should attempt to pursue as many solutions as possible. Furthermore, freeway widening will take years, and during the construction traffic could be even worse.


NOOZHAWK: What is your opinion of street narrowing and roundabouts as traffic-control measures, and do you think they have been successful?


DW: They have nearly always been successful in slowing down traffic in neighborhoods with children, but some have been implemented in a manner that led to much public acrimony. I’m not sure how to solve this. I hate to have to slow down, too, but I think people have a right to have safer streets in areas that were never meant to be thoroughfares for traffic.


NOOZHAWK: With regard to new buildings in downtown Santa Barbara, how high is too high? What should be the height limitation in terms of stories?


DW: I vigorously will require new buildings to adhere to our current height limits of 60 feet or under, and discourage them from even getting that big. But more important than height is requiring adequate setbacks from the street and articulation of the building shape, so much of it is lower than the highest points in order to protect viewsheds and minimize how imposing the building is.


NOOZHAWK: Is Santa Barbara losing its middle class?


DW: It is. Unless we are willing to build price-controlled, middle-income ownership units and protect our stock of rentals in the city we will lose our young people, our critical workforce of police, firefighters, teachers, nurses and public works personnel (like the people who daily make sure you get water when you turn on the tap). A community without another generation is a community without a soul. I will work to avoid this dark fate.


NOOZHAWK: Should the city help develop more workforce housing?


DW: I just answered that above. We should, not only to preserve a middle class but to prevent an even larger increase in traffic. As our workforce moves away the jobs stay here, which is drowning us in traffic. The last 10 years have seen a decrease in our population but an increase in traffic. I would rather have some of those folks downtown than clogging up our freeways daily.


NOOZHAWK: Seizing on the adoption of the Isla Vista Master Plan that will yield more than 1,400 housing units, Santa Barbara County has asked the state of California to certify that the I.V. plan satisfies the county's unmet need for affordable housing under the 2002 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Is it fair to use Isla Vista's willingness to accept increased density as a way to avoid a regional allocation of affordable housing units? How would you handle this obligation?


DW: The city has always exceeded its RHNA allocation and I think it's fair to say that the RHNA process does not drive our land-use policy. I cannot say that is also true of the county, where unfortunately all the units used to get dumped in Orcutt and now they’re trying to dump them all in I.V. Instead, I would rezone some of our commercial areas in various parts of the county into residential or mixed-use, which would fulfill the requirement of rezoning, without losing precious ag land.


NOOZHAWK: The City Council is looking at approving a new downtown transit center of up to four stories that, conceptually, would include affordable and market-rate housing, retail commercial space, a day-care center and underground parking. But under the proposal, most MTD buses would still require street parking. Do you agree with this approach?


DW: I leave it up to MTD to tell us how to maximize the efficiency of loading and we will design accordingly. What I know is that we need to make this an attractive place to wait for the bus — with news, coffee and food service preferably. We have asked the designer to minimize size, build and scale of the buildings while maximizing the amount of affordable and middle-income units we can provide. This is an important and difficult design-challenge, because we do not have enough money left in the RDA accounts to do many more housing projects. This one has to count.


NOOZHAWK: Measure A calls for aligning the city of Santa Barbara's Election Day with that of the nation by moving it to even-numbered years. Proponents say this would help boost voter turnout. Opponents say it would add a year to council members' four-year terms and lead to campaigns that are more partisan. Do you support Measure A?


DW: I support it, though it would not be good for me personally because of the five-year term. It is truly important to have higher voter turnout for democracy to really work the best it can, so I support it as sound policy.


NOOZHAWK: Mayor Marty Blum recently gave her staff a grade of A minus. What grade would you give?


DW: I would agree with the mayor. Our staff is extremely competent, but like everyone, messes up sometimes. What I think is important to know is they are not malicious. We all have to learn how to serve the public, with its competing and contradictory desires, better.


NOOZHAWK: Do you support cities competing with the private sector for the deployment of Internet broadband networks? If so, what is your preferred financing method to build the required infrastructure?


DW: I don’t know this issue well enough to give it an adequate answer.


NOOZHAWK: Have we heard the last of the "blue line"?


DW:I don’t think there will be a blue line, but there should be smaller public art projects that increase both education and participation on reducing global warming.


NOOZHAWK: What are your thoughts on medical marijuana? Do you agree with the mayor that it should be available in pharmacies?


DW: It should be treated as medicine, but that should be accompanied by the regulation and restrictions that prescription medicine has. People shouldn’t be smoking in the dispensary just like people hopefully aren’t popping pills in line at the pharmacy. They also should be a proper distance away from schools and with adequate security on site.


NOOZHAWK: What's your favorite neighborhood?


DW: The Mesa, because it has all the beaches, surf, and it votes for me.


NOOZHAWK: What book had the most impact on your life?


DW:The Bible and Lord of the Rings.


NOOZHAWK: What's your favorite movie?


DW:The Last Temptation of Christ.


NOOZHAWK: What music are you listening to now?


DW: Thievery Corporation & DJ Sander Klinenberg. A little U2.


NOOZHAWK: What kind of car do you drive?


DW: Prius Hybrid 2001


NOOZHAWK: What do you do for a living?


DW: Teacher and city councilman


NOOZHAWK: What political leader or historical figure do you draw inspiration from?

DW: Nelson Mandela. He understood that action was more important than words, and was gracious and forgiving in both victory and defeat. That transformed his prison guards from racists into supporters of liberation, and held together the country when I was there working in 1994...

Labels: ,


Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Das TV Ad 2

Labels: , ,


Energy Ordinance

[ Excerpt from the Truth & Progress Blog, post entitled "Energizing America ... Cities leading the way," by: a siegel, Oct 29, 2007 ]

... There are many rows to hoe to foster an Energy Smart culture, one that will enable us to create a Prosperous, Climate Friendly Society. Being Energy Smart begins at Home, but individuals will not, cannot create this path toward a sensible future alone, we work, live, and prosper in communities. And, well, isn't that what civilization is about?

Now, some communities in the nation are moving forward, are taking steps to create a sustainable energy future.

This diary will focus on recent announcements by three cities: Berkeley and Santa Barbara, California; and Richmond, Virginia...

Energizing America into an Energy Smart future will require engagement from us all, at all levels, individuals, businesses, communities, government (at all levels). One of EA2020's Core Principles is to Make the Right Choice, The Easy Choice (and the preferred choice)...






Committing to Better Buildings: Santa Barbara and Richmond


There are many organizations working hard to foster a better tomorrow, trying to figure out ways to navigate the combined threats of Peak Oil and Global Warming to create a sustainable energy future. So many that it is more than a full time job to keep track of all the activity out there. Amid all the plethora of organizations, Architecture 2030 is something that merits attention if you have any concerns about building infrastructure and its impacts related to energy/global warming. There are many challenges, targets, paths, but a core element is that all new buildings in the United States will be "Carbon-neutral in 2030 (using no fossil fuel GHG emitting energy to operate)".

The US Conference of Mayors and the National Association of County Officials have adopted resolutions supported Architecture 2030's objectives. There are a number of organizations and cities who have signed up with Architecture2030...

Santa Barbara is going a step farther. Last week, according to reporting in the Santa Barbara Daily Sound, the Santa Barbara's City Council unanimously adopted Architecture2030 Energy Ordinance, making it the first city-wide adoption in the United States. They did this a year after presentations by Ed Mazria, of Architecture 2030, who convinced the city to act, to act seriously.

The ordinance will enact building regulations exceeding state standards for energy use by 20 percent for low-rise residential buildings, 15 percent for high-rise residential buildings and 10 percent for nonresidential buildings, ...

The power of regulation, of building code. Building code is 'minimum', not optimal or recommended. This code will help drive buildings toward more reasonable (lower) energy use.

Calling it one of the most important acts the Council has taken in recent years, Councilmember Das Williams said it is about time "we grow up as a society" and stop being a "race of spoiled children, squandering away our natural resources."

...

"It's not every day contractors and architects come to us and say, can you make the rules a bit more stringent, please?" Councilmember HeleneSchneider said.

They know it is the right thing to do. Now they will have to spend less time convincing clients to take Energy Smart steps and can focus on ways to meet these targets.

Now, Santa Barbara's regulation needs state approval. And, when California's codes become tougher, these rules will be revisited -- hopefully to keep pushing the envelope toward greater energy efficiency...



Labels: ,


SBB Endorsement

Santa Barbara’s Blog endorsed Das for Santa Barbara City Council, October 29, 2007.

The following is what Das wrote in response:


“I just want to thank SantaBarbarasblog for their endorsement. Free media is an important part of a free society, and I also thank the Blog for keeping up this work. If you are a voter looking for easy answers to the problems of Santa Barbara, I am not your candidate, I have found that the answers to clean water, open space protection, and youth violence are anything but simple. The most complex and difficult issue this Council will be facing is planning for the future of Santa Barbara.

"How do we reduce traffic loads? Though I am against projects on open space, I have realized that saying no to all development just increases our traffic loads, as more and more people commute from Ventura, Oxnard, and the North County. How can we house a significant portion of our middle-class without losing that unique feel of Santa Barbara? That is our greatest challenge. Since we cannot ever meet the demand for housing, how can we increase transportation options (bus, rail, carpool, and bike) in the City and from neighboring cities? If you want someone who will work hard on those issues, I am your candidate.

"I also am your candidate if you want the City to be a leader in alternative energy and energy and water conservation. Living within our resources means to me that we should not force our problems on our neighbors or on future generations, but do our best to solve them here, with what we have. I believe we have the talents, funds, and resources as a community to face these issues, and we shall do that together.”

-- Das Williams





To view the original posting and comments to it, please go to:

SBB Endorses Das Williams

Labels: ,


Saturday, October 27, 2007

Das TV Ad

Labels: , ,


Campaign Disclosures

[ Excerpt from: "Williams continues to lead money chase," by ERIC LINDBERG, DAILY SOUND, October 25, 2007 ]


With just under two weeks left until Election Day, the eight candidates vying for one of three seats on the Santa Barbara City Council filed their final round of campaign finance disclosure forms today.

Once again, incumbent Das Williams led the way down the fundraising trail, netting $17,432 in contributions between September 23 and October 20. Incumbents Helene Schneider and Brian Barnwell followed about $3,500 behind, and the three fundraising challengers brought up the rear.


Brian Barnwell

After pulling in $13,102 since September 23, Barnwell has unloaded about $11,615 on his campaign, dropping around $7,700 on campaign literature and $3,900 on radio advertising.

Some notable donations during the last month include another $2,500 infusion from the Santa Barbara Police Officer’s Association, bringing their total contribution to $5,000, and a $400 gift from Planned Parenthood. Santa Barbara Old Town Trolley also chipped in $1,000, as did local real estate appraiser James Hammock.
Over the course of his campaign, Barnwell has brought in $23,523 and spent $15,127.


Dale Francisco

The software engineer took out a $5,000 loan in his name during the last month, bringing his total debt to $15,000. Francisco also received $7,027 in contributions and spent $18,520, leaving his stockpile at about $14,000.

Expenses included $5,000 on campaign literature, $9,300 in agent reimbursements, $7,363 on radio ads and $1,424 on yard signs. Francisco received a $1,000 endorsement from the Lincoln Club of Santa Barbara County in recent weeks, an organization that supports the principles of the Republican Party.


Michelle Giddens

Including a $2,300 loan in her name, Giddens has pulled in 8,950 since late September. Campaign expenditures, including $6,185 on campaign literature and $1,480 on advertising in the Santa Barbara Independent, have drained slightly more than $9,000 from her pockets.

Local Realtors Jerry Beaver and Alan Ebenstein made contributions to Giddens’ campaign. Overall, the challenger has raised $14,375 and spent all but $1,789 since her race for a Council seat began.


Frank Hotchkiss

With $6,415 pouring in to his campaign coffers since September 23, the outspoken Realtor has shelled out $5,775 on his run for a spot on the Council dais.
A good portion of that money, $3,000, has gone to radio advertisements. Hotchkiss also spent close to $1,000 on 250 yard signs, $722 on phone banks and $422 on campaign literature.

Hotchkiss received a $1,000 nod from the Lincoln Club of Santa Barbara County, along with a $1,000 plug from a local dentist, Assad Mora. So far, he’s received $10,314 and spent $6,224.


Helene Schneider

Since the last round of disclosure forms, Schneider has raised nearly $14,000, bringing the total contributions to her campaign to $48,220. She has spent $27,117 of that total, with more than half of those expenditures occurring during the last few weeks.

Campaign literature expenses drew $9,253 from her coffers. She also spent $5,000 on radio airtime and $4,120 on a campaign consultant.

Notable donations during the last month include $1,000 from Allied Waste, $2,500 from the Santa Barbara Police Officers Association, and $5,000 from the SEIU Local 620 (Service Employees International Union).


Das Williams

... Williams has netted a total of $72,067 since starting his campaign with about $17,500 pouring in during the last month. Of that total, he’s pulled out about $65,100 for television spots and campaign literature, among other expenses.
Since September 23, Williams spent $16,671 on TV commercials and $6,646 on campaign literature. He also shelled out $1,500 for accounting services.

Among major contributions in recent weeks are a $1,000 jolt from Allied Waste and another $1,000 from Marborg, not to mention $5,000 from the SEIU Local 620 and $4,000 from billionaire Peter Sperling. Planned Parenthood chipped in $400 and Democratic Women of Santa Barbara County added $750.


The remaining two challengers, Robert Hansen and Dan Litten, filed disclosure forms stating they do not plan on raising more than $1,000. During the lead-up to the election, candidates will continue to file late contribution forms for any cash that flows in before November 6. Copies of all campaign disclosure forms are available at the City Clerk’s office upon request.



Labels: , ,


Friday, October 26, 2007

Indy Endorsements

[ Excerpt of "2007 Endorsements," By Indy Staff, SB INDEPENDENT, October 25, 2007 ]


When you go to the voting booth on Tuesday, November 6 — or cast your absentee ballot — The Independent strongly urges you to vote for Brian Barnwell, Helene Schneider, and Das Williams for City Council...

Brian Barnwell, Helene Schneider, and Das Williams bring unique sensibilities to the job. Barnwell is a centrist Democrat and a passionate planning wonk, given to brilliant — if at times anguished — soliloquies. Williams is a progressive Democrat who embodies an intriguing blend of evangelical Christianity, surfer-dude environmentalism, and economic populism. And Schneider is endowed with rare administrative savvy, which she deploys to tackle seemingly insoluble social problems, like chronic homelessness. On their individual merits, these three incumbents richly deserve to be reelected. As a group, they’ve developed a fruitful working rapport throughout the years that would be foolish to throw away.

All have worked energetically and creatively to address the stiff challenges confronting both City Hall and the broader Santa Barbara community. They’ve struggled to address the social violence inflicted when working families find themselves evicted so luxury condominiums can be built. We trust they will bring wisdom, insight, and good faith to bear when balancing the need for maximum housing affordability and neighborhood preservation. The rise of gang violence defies simple solutions and cheap slogans, but we’re confident these three will not shirk from finding the best combination of carrot and stick. When it comes to traffic congestion, we’re not so utopian as to believe the automobile can be rendered obsolete within our lifetime. But as a society, we clearly need alternatives right now. Improved mass transit, better bike lanes, commuter rail, telecommuting, staggered work schedules — all of these will be part of the solution. And these three have demonstrated a commitment to making this happen. Finally, when it comes to sustainability, the City of Santa Barbara is now committed to walking the walk, not just talking the talk. This did not happen overnight, nor did it happen by accident. Were it not for the three incumbents — Barnwell, Schneider, and Williams — it’s doubtful it would have happened at all.

In recent months, City Hall has approved two major solar installations on its own structures, and eliminated many of the design guidelines that have inhibited its citizens from going solar on their own. City parks use far less pesticide today than they did four years ago, and steps are being taken to make Santa Barbara’s creeks more accommodating and hospitable to steelhead trout. Not only that, but City Hall is leading the charge to convert South Coast trash into cleaner-burning fuels, and changing its architectural design guidelines to ensure maximum energy efficiency in the future. There’s still much work to be done. Reelect Barnwell, Schneider, and Williams, and let them finish the job...

Labels: ,


Tuesday, October 23, 2007

"Chewin' On The Cadidates"

Off Leash Public Affairs recently interviewed all candidates in the forthcoming elections for city council:

Part 1:



Part 2:

Labels: , ,


Friday, October 19, 2007

PUEBLO Endorsements

Email from P.U.E.B.L.O., this morning:

"Members interviewed candidates running for City Council. They asked questions about renter's rights, affordable housing, immigration, public transportation, and youth issues. HELENE SCHNEIDER and DAS WILLIAMS stood out as having a real understanding of how these issues effect working families and what the City Council can and should be doing. PUEBLO Members then voted to endorse and work on their re-election campaigns. We will be focusing on building precinct teams to walk and phone 12 precincts in Santa Barbara. Please let us know if you want to volunteer, or come to our Santa Barbara Committee meeting on Sunday October 21, 4pm, at Presidio Springs, 721 Laguna St."

PUEBLO also supports Measure A

Labels: , ,


Thursday, October 18, 2007

Touring With The Candidate

Labels:


Friday, October 12, 2007

Indy Endorses Incumbents

[ Excerpt of "2007 Endorsements: Santa Barbara City Council," SB INDEPENDENT, October 11, 2007 ]


For too long, the City of Santa Barbara and its elected leaders rested on their environmental laurels as the so-called birthplace of the environmental movement. But, in fact, many similar-sized cities were pursuing more innovative programs than our own. In recent years, however, that’s changed — and dramatically for the better. City Hall approved two major solar installations on its own structures and has eliminated design guidelines that hindered private residents from going solar. City parks use far less pesticides today than they did four years ago. Santa Barbara’s creeks are being managed better, providing hope that our once famous steelhead trout can better survive. And City Hall is leading the charge to convert South Coast trash into cleaner burning fuels. None of this happened by accident. Many have contributed to this effort. But key among them are the three incumbent councilmembers running for reelection: Brian Barnwell, Helene Schneider, and Das Williams. When you go to the voting booth Tuesday, November 6 — or cast your ballot absentee style — we strongly urge you to keep them in office



(Image courtesy of SBI and J'Amy Brown)



Each member of this trio brings decidedly idiosyncratic sensibilities to the job. Barnwell, a centrist Democrat and a passionate planning wonk given to brilliant, if at times anguished, soliloquies, has amassed a voting record that defies easy prediction. Schneider, who emerged out of Santa Barbara’s wellspring of activist women, tackled seemingly insoluble social problems — like chronic homelessness — deploying administrative savvy and behind-the-scenes bureaucratic expertise. And Williams, a progressive Democrat, has sought to harness his evangelical Christianity, local surf-dude environmentalism, and economic populism into the service of his considerable political ambition.

On their own merits, each of these three incumbents richly deserves to be reelected. As a group, they don’t always agree, and, in fact, have on occasion expressed exasperation with the behavior of each other. But, over time, this threesome has achieved a cooperative working style that has been put to good use. Certainly all three have worked energetically to address the stiff challenges confronting both City Hall and the broader Santa Barbara community. All three have exhibited good faith in their efforts to come to terms with Santa Barbara’s conflicting and often polarized constituencies. And all three have done exactly what they said they’d do when they were elected for the first time four years ago. Given this, we enthusiastically endorse the reelection of the three incumbents.

We don’t delude ourselves into thinking this group has all the answers. We are convinced, however, that on the big issues, they will try to ask the right questions. And that’s huge.

While the key challengers in this race — Dale Francisco, Dave Hotchkiss, and Michelle Giddens — have pointed out some shortcomings in City Hall’s decision-making process, we don’t feel they provide the depth of experience or breadth of vision required to step into the post. And to the extent they have articulated a broader vision of city government, we think it’s way too narrow and limiting for the challenges ahead. Challenger and homeless advocate Bob Hansen has played the role of political court jester to good effect, livening up otherwise predictable forums with irreverent wit coupled with some good ideas. It’s worth noting that he has thrown his support behind the incumbents.

Certainly one of the toughest problems confronting the South Coast is that of gentrification and the attendant loss of community character. As real estate values soar, Santa Barbara’s working people and middle classes find themselves increasingly forced out of the city by market forces largely beyond government control. Yet this City Council has chosen to address — and when possible, prevent — such social upheaval. In the coming four years, during the crucial general plan update process, Santa Barbara as a community will seek to achieve maximum affordable housing while preserving the personality of individual neighborhoods and the city’s cherished small-town character. We harbor no illusions that this tension will be easy to navigate. But we are confident that Barnwell, Schneider, and Williams are best suited among the candidates to synthesize such conflicting objectives into as coherent a government plan as humanly possible.




(Image courtesy of SBI and Paul Wellman)


On the question of gang violence — posed with violent urgency when 15-year-old Luis Angel Linares was stabbed to death on State Street — the council as a whole found itself scrambling to respond. We were disappointed that no one on the council provided the much-needed voice of moral witness that the moment demanded. But we were also impressed by how hard Schneider and Williams went to work securing more city funds for anti-gang prevention programs. As a result, City Hall will be spending about $200,000 more in general fund revenues on youth programs and about $600,000 in a youth jobs program funded with grant money City Hall just secured. In addition, Schneider and Williams found the funds to reinstate bike patrol officers to neighborhoods on the Westside and Eastside plagued by substantial gang activity. Santa Barbara has always had gangs; gang violence has always ebbed and flowed. It’s not sufficient to proclaim, as some challengers have, that gang members must either leave their gangs or get out of town. A more nuanced approach is required, and we think these incumbents will provide that.

Many of the challengers have accused the City Council — and City Hall — of an anti-automobile bias that is dangerously at odds with the two-car reality of most Santa Barbara families. The charge “social engineering” is frequently leveled. They just don’t get it.




(Image courtesy of SBI and Paul Wellman)


Santa Barbara’s roads are already dangerously congested. We lack the money and real estate to meaningfully expand the carrying capacity of our streets. To its credit, the current City Council — with the incumbents again leading the charge — has significantly expanded funding so that the Metropolitan Transit District can provide better and more frequent bus service. Commuter rail is an absolute necessity, not the Holy Grail its critics claim. Barnwell, Schneider, and Williams have an impressive record achieving small successes in the pursuit of commuter rail service despite their opponents’ derisive pessimism.

This is an impressive record for councilmembers in their first term. Brian Barnwell, Helene Schneider, and Das Williams deserve our votes. All three are honest, hardworking, diligent, and effective public officials. But there is still much work to be done. Let them finish the job they started; reelect to the Santa Barbara City Council Brian Barnwell, Helene Schneider, and Das Williams.

Labels: ,


Monday, October 08, 2007

Candidate Statements

The City of Santa Barbara has made the statements of the candidates in this year's election available for viewing, in both video and written formats. To review the candidates written statements and their video presentations, including Das', please go to:

Candidate Statements (Video & Text)

To view Das' specific statement in video or text format, please go to:

Das' Candidate Statement

Labels: ,


Friday, October 05, 2007

Measure A Video

Das is one of the many supporters of Measure A:

Labels: ,


Campaign 2007 Fundraising 2

[ Excerpt from: "Das Williams Leads Money Chase," by Nick Welsh, SB INDEPENDENT, October 4, 2007 ]


If money talks, Santa Barbara City Council candidate Das Williams is shouting at a time when the rest of the candidates — and certainly the challengers — are whispering. Since the beginning of the year, Williams, an incumbent, has raised nearly $55,000, including $22,500 in the past three months alone. That’s a lot, especially considering $80,000 was the most any candidate spent in the last race.

But Williams — an outspoken operator who has sought to fuse environmental, social justice, and neighborhood preservation agendas under his political tent — has also spent way more than any other candidate: $42,000. Williams said $8,000 went to pay for a survey he commissioned several months ago that showed, among other things, strong popular support for City Hall’s anti-global warming agenda but little for efforts to impeach the president.

Williams’s biggest donation came from Ray Mahoob ($2,000), a State Street real estate owner whom Williams said he’s known since the two attended fourth grade together. Realtor Suzanne Perkins gave $2,000 as well; Perkins has supported Williams in the past because of his efforts to limit development along the Gaviota Coast. Williams got $1,500 combined from two ChannelKeeper supporters, Craig Madsen and Dan Emmett, both Los Angeles attorneys with property on the South Coast. He also got $750 from a Manhattan Beach compressed natural gas company, Clean Energy.

After Williams, incumbent Helene Schneider, another progressive Democrat with strong ties to Santa Barbara’s community of feminist activists, reported the second-largest campaign war chest at $33,000. Most of Schneider’s donations reflected her base, but she received $250 from Pete Jordano and $250 each from Susan and Jim Petrovich, three people typically associated with much more conservative causes. Jordano’s wife, Gerd, has reportedly been an active supporter of Planned Parenthood, where Schneider worked before securing a spot on the council four years ago. The Petroviches were vocal supporters of Sheriff Bill Brown in his successful campaign against then incumbent sheriff Jim Anderson a year ago, and Schneider was one of the few elected officials to endorse Brown in that race.

Coming in third was challenger and first-time candidate Dale Francisco, spurred into the race by his outrage over the mini-roundabouts; he’s raised $15,700. Of that, he loaned $10,600 to himself, and another $3,000 came from activists who lobbied unsuccessfully to stop City Hall from making the temporary mini-roundabouts permanent.

Incumbent Brian Barnwell came in fourth, reporting $10,421 in campaign contributions, one-third of which came in the past three months. Barnwell, who surely raised more money at his Monday night campaign party at Eos, raked in many small donations from architects, land use attorneys, and politicos. But his biggest donations came from the police officers’ union — which contributed $2,500 — and trash czar Mario Borgatello of MarBorg Industries, who donated $2,000 through two holding companies, Asti and Spumoni. Barnwell — who is regularly criticized in the News-Press editorial pages — received a $250 check from former News-Press publisher Joe Cole. Cole’s resignation in April 2006 triggered the News-Press meltdown that began later that summer.

Challenger Michelle Giddens reported raising $5,300; $2,000 of that came from anti-roundabout activists James and Sharon Westby. She also received $500 from developer Wayne Siemens — who typically gives to liberal causes and candidates — and $500 from former school boardmember Lanny Ebenstein, who ran unsuccessfully for mayor against incumbent Marty Blum last year. Giddens is another newcomer to Santa Barbara politics, having gotten involved during the uproar over “mansionization” of certain Mesa neighborhoods. Giddens argued that property owners should be allowed greater flexibility in designing their remodels and lobbied unsuccessfully against the more stringent ordinance passed last year by the City Council.

Frank Hotchkiss, a onetime actor and ex-PR mogul turned writer and real estate broker, reported having raised $3,900. Hotchkiss, who took issue with the controversial Light Blue Line project and efforts to extract more below-market housing from developers, received $1,000 from Beth Rogers, the moderate Republican with libertarian leanings who ran for Congress against Lois Capps a few years ago.

With regard to challengers Bob Hansen and Dan Litten, neither has raised enough money to trigger campaign disclosure laws. Litten, a doctor at Cottage Hospital who moved to Santa Barbara in 2001, said he intends to run without asking for any money.

Last but not least, the committee in favor of Measure A — which would require the City of Santa Barbara to hold its elections the same years as state and federal campaigns — failed to raise the $1,000 necessary to trigger reporting requirements. The committee against Measure A raised $500, all from Lanny Ebenstein.

----------------------------

For the original article and comments at SB INDEPENDENT, please go to:
SBI: Das Leads in Fundraising

Labels: ,


Campaign 2007 Brochure 2


Thursday, October 04, 2007

2007 Campaign Brochure 1


!-- APTURE SCRIPT............................................................................... -->