The following is from: Orliac, Catherine. "The rongorongo tablets from Easter Island: botanical identification and 14C dating.(Research Report)."
Archaeology in Oceania 40.3 (Oct 2005): 115(5).
Seven Easter Island rongorongo tablets and one pectoral, now housed in various museums, are described. All are made of Thespesia populnea, a wood used widely
in Polynesian traditional ceremonies. Wood from one tablet is dated
to 80 +/- 40 BP.
Keywords: Easter Island, Rapa Nui, rongorongo, Thespesia populnea, 14C dating.
[Malcolm's note: All of the Rongorongo Tablets outside Rapa Nui and the pectoral should be returned to the people of Rapa Nui. Until that time, I believe they should be considered stolen objects.]
Today's palaeographic linguists agree to qualify as writing the signs discovered
on twenty-one tablets (rongorongo), two crescent-shaped pectorals (rei miro),
one staff, and one birdman representation from Easter Island. The presence of writing on such a tiny, extremely isolated island is an enigma. The issue of
dating its appearance triggers many controversies. Since no convincing answers
have yet been presented, it appears fundamental to develop a new approach
focusing directly on the raw material. Consequently, the botanical
identification of seven rongorongo tablets and the 14C dating for one of them should allow a better understanding of their age and nature and therefore help
to appreciate the tablets' symbolic value in the context of Polynesian
Method of investigation
The subjects of our study are some tablets which are among the most beautiful
and the best preserved of the twenty-one known. We focused on the two tablets
in Santiago de Chile (catalogue numbers 314 and 315), the Arnku Kurenga and
Mamari tablets (no catalogue numbers) of the Congregation of Sacred Hearts of
Jesus and Mary (SSCC) in Rome, the small St Petersburg tablet (catalogue
number 402/13-1), the London tablet (catalogue number 1903-150) and the London
rei miro (catalogue number 9295). We shall also take into account the botanical determination realized in 1934 on the large tablet of the Museum of Ethnography
in Vienna (catalogue number 22869).
Macroscopic examinations with a stereo microscope were carried out by the author
on the surface of the rei miro and on all these rongorongo except large Vienna tablet. Samples a few millimetres in length and in width and a few tenths of a millimetre thick were also removed by the author with a razor blade from St Petersburg tablet, Aruku Kurenga and Mamari tablets. These samples were
orientated perpendicularly to the axis of the tree (transverse section), perpendicularly to the wood's rays (tangential section) and parallel to the rays (radial section); they were examined under episcopic microscope (100 X to 400 X) and scanning electron microscope (1000 X to 4000 X). The botanical
identification was realized by the author in the ethnobiology laboratory of
Museum national d'Histoire naturelle in Paris. This identification was done by comparison with a reference collection housed in the xylariorum of this museum.
Presentation of the rongorongo and the pectoral studied
In 1996, during an exhibition organised by the Musee d'Aquitaine in Bordeaux,
the large and small Santiago tablets were displayed in France for the first
time. These two prestigious objects had been given by Father Roussel, in 1870,
to the officers of the Chilean corvette O'Higgins (Fisher 1997: 442-50). The
small Santiago tablet, which measures 32 cm in length by 12.1 cm wide and
1.8 cm thick, has 720 glyphs. The large tablet measures 44.5 cm in length,
11.6 cm wide and 2.7 cm thick; it is covered with more than 1500 glyphs. One
of its sides has a deep burned groove indicating that the object was later
used in a device for making fire through friction. No samples were taken from
these objects which are entirely covered in rongorongo motifs. However, these
two tablets are carved in the direction of the wood fibres, and a macroscopic analysis of the surface, enlarged 16 to 80 times, made it possible to observe
the wood's structure in tangential section.
The Mamari and Aruku Kurenga tablets in the SSCC collection at Rome were studied
in 2002. The Aruku Kurenga tablet measures 41 cm in length, 15.2 cm wide and 2.3
cm thick; it is covered on both sides by 1290 glyphs and comes from the
collection of Monseigneur Jaussen, collected by Fathers Roussel and Zumbohm on Easter Island in 1870 (Fisher 1997: 427). Macroscopic observations were made on this tablet's surface in tangential section; samples were removed in transverse section at the location of an earlier sampling carried out in 1933 at the
request of Professor Paul Rivet (Lavachery 1934: 69).
The Mamari tablet (Figure 1) measures 29 cm in length by 19.5 cm wide and
2.5 cm thick; it is covered with a thousand glyphs and is said to have belonged
to the ariki Nga'ara, king of the island around 1840; it was then acquired by Father Zumbohm at the end of 1869 or in early 1870 (Fisher 1997: 417).
Macroscopic observations were made on the surface of this tablet in tangential section; samples were taken in transverse section at the location of earlier samples removed in 1933 (Lavachery 1934: 70). In 1934, the wood of this object
was identified, by the phanerogamy laboratory of Museum national d'Histoire naturelle in Paris, as a Myrtaceae, which is incorrect.
The small St Petersburg tablet was studied in the Kunstkamera in 2003. It
measures 44 cm in length, 9 cm wide and 2.3 cm thick; collected by
Miklukho-Maklai at Tahiti, in 1871 (Fisher 1997: 478), it is covered on both
sides with about 900 glyphs. Samples in transverse, tangential and radial
section were taken at the location of an early sample taken from one of the object's long sides. Samples for dating were taken at the same point.
The rongorongo tablet and the rei miro from British Museum collection were
studied in 2004. The London tablet measures 22 cm in lengh, 6.8 cm wide and
1.8 cm thick; 250 elements cover both sides of this object. Its provenance is unsure; it might have been collected in Rapa Nui by the British ship's surgeon
John Linton Palmer in 1868 (Fisher 1997: 487).
The London rei miro measures 41.2 cm wide and 10.5 cm in length; 50 glyphs
have been incised on the front side which is the 'longest rongorongo
inscription that does not adorn a staff or tablet' (Fisher 1997: 493). This
rei miro was purchased by the Christy Trustees from the Reverend William
Sparrow Simpson in 1875.
No samples were taken from the two London objects. Because they are carved in
the direction of the wood fibres, macroscopic analysis of their surface made
it possible to observe the wood's structure in tangential section.
Because of works of renovation in the Museum of Ethography in Vienna, the
author was not able to study the large Vienna tablet. However the botanical identification realized in 1934 by M. L. Conrard, assistant in the phanerogamy laboratory of the Musdum national d'Histoire naturelle, must be taken into
account; this object, featuring 120 glyphs, measures 28.4 cm in length,
13.7 cm wide and 2.5 cm thick. The tablet was brought back from Tahiti by the German consul, Herr Schlubach, who had obtained it in 1882 from Alexander
Salmon, the uncle of his Tahitian wife (Fisher 1997: 501-5).
Botanical identification of the wood of these tablets and rei miro
These seven rongorongo tablets, as well as the rei miro from British Museum and
the large Vienna tablet are carved in the wood of Thespesia populnea, known on
Rapa Nui by the name of makoi. This tree, which can attain a height of 15 m, belongs to the Malvaceae family and grows in eastern Polynesia on the shores of atolls and high islands. According to the botanist G. Zizka (Zizka 1991: 20, 51), the makoi was probably brought to Rapa Nui by the first settlers who settled on
the island around the 8th century AD (Skjolsvold 1994). Oral tradition reports
that it travelled on the canoe of the first mythical king, Hotu Matua (Metraux 1971:17).
Thespesia populnea, the 'rose wood of Oceania', is slightly pinkish when young
and takes on a dark red colour with purple glints when the tree gets older. It produces yellow, slightly perfumed flowers and its fruits, leaves and bark
supply a yellow dye. The peduncle of the green fruit produces a yellow glutinous juice and the pericarp of the fruit an odourless yellow sap which the Hawaiians used to colour their tapa. Formerly in the Marquesas Islands, the juice of the Thespesia populnea's bark was used for dyeing tapa intended for new-born infants (Petard 1986: 120, 218).
Oral traditions provide little information about the symbolic role of colours in Rapa Nui. But vestiges of red and yellow dye appear on the neck and torso of
some moai (monumental stone sculptures) as well as in some parietal paintings. These two pigments were also used for body paintings (Metraux 1971: 158, 236-7). The red colour was obtained by crushing rocks rich in iron oxide; the yellow dye came from the root of Curcuma longa and doubtless also from the fruits and the
bark of Thespesia populnea.
The use of the wood of Thespesia populnea as support for the Rapa Nui writing is unexpected due to the fact that makoi is rarely mentioned in oral Rapa Nui traditions and songs (Metraux 1971: 353, 364). Nevertheless, Thespesia populnea
has the status of a sacred tree in eastern Polynesia where it played an important role. In Tahiti, it was planted in cult places, or marae (Henry 1968 : 396). It
was used to sculpt divinities in the Gambier Islands, and also for offering posts (Orliac 2002: 205).
Macroscopic observation on the wood of these rongorongo
Macroscopic observation shows that these seven rongorongo are carved in the direction of the wood fibres, that is perpendicularly to the ligneous rays. The width of these objects thus provides precious information about the size of the pieces of wood used and, consequently, about the size of the branches and trunks which were employed.
The tablets studied are respectively 9 cm, 11.6 cm, 12.1 cm, 13.7 cm, 15.2 cm
and 19.5 cm in width, which corresponds, as is shown by the convergence of the rays, to branches or trunks of approximately the same size; macroscopic
observation does not allow us to assert that these tablets were carved in the totality of the diameter of the branches or trunks, but Mamari clearly displays marks of lighter sapwood, indicating that this object was sculpted in a trunk
of 19.5 cm in diameter, which corresponds to a Thespesia populnea about 15 m in height.
This finding leads us to wonder about the age of the Mamari tablet and, consequently, about that of the Rapa Nui writing. When the first Europeans
landed on the island, during the 18th century, they did not mention any trees
of this size. In 1722, Jacob Roggeveen discovered an island "of a singular
poverty and barrenness" (Sharp 1970: 93) covered with dry grass. The records of Felipe Gonzales in 1770 (Gonzales 1908: vol. 13: 101), James Cook and the
Forsters in 1774 (Forster 1786: vol. 1 : 591), and La Perouse in 1786 (La
Perouse 1981: 95-96) confirm the absence of big trees. Forster mentions only
'two or three shrubs'; he indicates only some small paper mulberry trees and
three sorts of 'bush'; The first, which he called Hibiscus populneus, is
Thespesia populnea; a second 'shrub' whose leaves looked like those of the ash
tree is probably Caesalpinia major; and finally a small 'mimosa' called
Torromedo--Sophora toromiro--which covered a hill east of Hanga Roa (Forster
1786: vol 1-591). No trees of more than 10 m height are mentioned in the
journals of the navigators. This indicates that the Mamari tablet could have
been carved before the disappearance of the forest, an event which charcoal analysis places in the first half of the 17th century (Orliac 2000: 216). Only radiocarbon dating of the wood of these tablets seems able to provide answers
to the problem of the antiquity of Rapa Nui writing.
14C dating of the small St Petersburg tablet
In 2003, for the first time, a rongorongo tablet was dated by the accelerator
mass spectrometry technique. Twenty milligrams of material were removed from the site of an earlier sampling on one of the St Petersburg tablet's long sides.
This sample was sent to Beta Analytic Inc in Miami. The conventional radiocarbon age obtained (Beta 184112) is 80 +/-40 BP and the 2 sigma calibration age (95% probability) is Cal AD 1680 to Cal AD 1740 (Cal BP 270 to 200) and Cal AD 1800
to 1930 (Cal BP 150 to 20) and AD 1950 to 1960 (Cal BP 0 to 0); in fact, this rongorongo was collected in 1871 by Miklukho-Maklai so the second probability is most likely.
Two remarks are necessary before interpreting this date:
1. According to botanists, Thespesia populnea is not a tree which lives a long
life (80 years at the most), which leads to a small margin of error for dates on objects made from its wood.
2. Makoi wood is of medium density. It is not very durable and does not preserve well in tropical regions; only excellent conservation conditions would allow objects carved in this wood to be preserved for a long time.
The state of the tablet's surface argues in favour of an early date, that is between AD 1680 and 1740, because the wood is very corroded, especially at one
end which also displays traces of tunnels made by wood-eating insects. Moreover,
on one of its sides an assemblage of glyphs seems to be very worn.
However, it could also be argued that the superficial degradation of the wood
might be the effect not of the object's great age but of bad conservation conditions. Furthermore, the weathering of the surface could be due to the fact that the tablet was cast in a clumsy way (concerning these plaster casts see
Fisher 1997: 398-400). On the other hand, it should be noted that none of the
other tablets display identical degradation, despite being carved in the same
wood and having also been cast.
There is another argument in favour of the object's antiquity: that is the
presence of the sign called niu which may designate an Easter Island palm tree called Paschalococos disperta by botanists; this palm tree is a close relative
of Jubea chilensis, a sugar palm with a trunk swollen into the shape of a bottle. This could mean that the tablet was carved before the arrival of the Europeans,
in a period when this giant palm tree still grew on Easter Island. But it is also possible that this glyph designates an entity, a concept and even perhaps a word
or a syllable with no strong link with local flora; in that case, the niu sign could have been engraved on tablets long after the disappearance of the Paschalococos.
In fact, there is no irrefutable argument enabling one to claim that the small
St Petersburg tablet dates to the end of the 17th century or the beginning of the 18th, rather than the 19th century.
These xylological analysis made on seven rongorongo tablets and a rei miro shows that they were all carved in the wood of a tree endowed, in eastern Polynesia,
with strong symbolic power. Thespesia populnea, introduced to Rapa Nui by the
first settlers, was doubtless considered formerly as a sacred tree, maybe one of the most suitable to be used as a support for this unique writing formed of
glyphs which some people, at the end of the 19th century, still thought was
endowed with dangerous magic powers.
The 14C dating of only one of these tablets does not enable us to assert that
these objects precede the arrival of the first Europeans, even if the size of Mamari tablet can suggest it. Only the dating of other rongorongo tablets in Thespesia populnea wood would make it possible to better determine their age and, in consequence, to put forward reliable hypotheses about the antiquity of rongorongo writing which, without any doubt, constitutes one of the most original features of Rapa Nui culture.
I thank the Congregation of Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary, in Rome, which welcomed me warmly and allowed me to study the Aruku Kurenga and Mamari tablets.
I am also grateful to all those who helped me in the Kunstkamera of St
Petersburg: Yuri K. Chistov, director of the museum, Irina Fedorova, Konstantin Pozdniakov, Tatiana Lopatina, chief curator of the collections, Sergej Stavostenkov, curator of the department of Australia and Oceania, and Alexej Timofejev, restorer, who removed the samples for dating. I also thank Dr Lissant Bolton, Curator of the Pacific and Australian Collections, and Jill Hasell,
Museum assistant of Pacific and Australian collections, for their very precious assistance during my long stay in British Museum. I am grateful to my husband, Michel Orliac, for his advices and to Paul Bahn for his help in the translation
of this paper.
Lavachery, H. 1934. Les bois employes dans l'ile de Paques. Bulletin de la
Societe des Americanistes de Belgique, 13: 67-71.
Fisher, S.R. 1997. Rongorongo, the Easter Island script. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Forster, G. 1786. Florulae insularum australium prodromus. Gettingen.
Gonzales, F. 1908. The voyage of don Felipe Gonzales ... to Easter Island in
1770-71. Hakluyt Soc. vol 13. Cambridge.
Henry, T. 1968. Tahiti aux temps anciens. Societe des Oceanistes no. 1. Musee de l'Homme, Paris.
La Perouse, 1981. Voyage autour du monde. Jean de Bonnot. Paris.
Metraux, A. 1971. Ethnology of Easter Island. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin
Orliac, C. 2000. The woody vegetation of Easter Island between the early 14th
to the mid-17th centuries AD. In C. M. Stevenson and W.S. Ayres (eds), Easter Island Archaeology. Research on early Rapa Nui culture: 199-207. Easter Island Foundation, Los Osos (CA).
Orliac, C. 2002. Le dieu Rao de Mangareva et le Curcuma longa. Journal de la Societe des Oceanistes 114-5: 201-207.
Petard, P. 1986. Plantes utiles de Polynesie. Raau Tahiti. Haere Po No, Tahiti.
Sharp, A. 1970. Journal of Jacob Roggeveen. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Skjolsvold A. 1994. Archaeological investigation at Anakena, Easter Island. The
Kon-Tiki Museum, Occasional Papers, vol 3. Oslo.
Zizka, G. 1991. Flowering plants of Easter Island. Palmarum Hortus
Francofurtensis PHF 3. Frankfurt am Main.
Ethnobiology Laboratory CP26, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, 57 rue
Cuvier, 75231 Paris, France. email@example.com